September 25, 2009...3:52 PM

Old craft vs. new craft at the Philadelphia Art Alliance

Jump to Comments

 Rachel B. Abrams, Elaborate Mythologies, 2005. Slip-cast porcelain, beaded glass tubes, thread, acrylic. H 3, W 4, D 4 ft.

Rachel B. Abrams, Elaborate Mythologies, 2005. Slip-cast porcelain, beaded glass tubes, thread, acrylic. H 3, W 4, D 4 ft.

State of the Union: Contemporary Craft in Dialogue,” the exhibition that just opened at the Philadelphia Art Alliance, is a bid to move beyond the decades-long debate on craft versus fine art, and present work by emerging artists employing so-called craft media as a simple artistic choice. Melissa Caldwell, the PAA’s director of exhibitions and the curator, explains that she wants to track craft’s “reinstatement of itself on its own terms.” How revealing then, that, in spite of this ambition to present craft media as simply another choice that a new generation can make without the political minefield navigated by the “Craft” with a capital “C” generation, the exhibition still comes freighted with a new polemic about the notion of “craft” with a lowercase “c.” The exhibition, and its clear-headed premise, however, does represent a welcome and significant step forward.

Caldwell suggests that it’s not helpful to see “State of the Union” as some sort of definitive reckoning. “It’s not a comprehensive survey,” she explains. “It’s a sampling of interesting people.” These “interesting people” are twelve artists who, in different ways, comment on the notion of craft, whether through form, process, or material. Caldwell notes the influence of recent scholarship, particularly that of British academic Glenn Adamson, on the exhibition—which is another reason the PAA can make this old dialectic fresh again. The PAA’s bid for a redefined debate about craft media is a welcome change from Craft’s earlier plaintive (and unsuccessful) bid for acceptance by the ruthlessly elitist (and proud of it) art world. This work demands to be seen on its own terms.

Among the artists chosen for this exhibition is Jen Blazina, a Philadelphia-based installation artist whose earlier work dealt with themes of memory and ghosts of sorts, often employing glass. (Blazina’s work in “State of the Union” is cast hydrocal.) Glass is included in the exhibition in the form of an assemblage of porcelain and glass by Brooklyn-based Rachel B. Abrams. In her artist’s statement, Abrams describes how her work is shaped by other kinds of dialectics: experience and time or action and consequence, among others.

The delicately beaded glass tubes Abrams incorporates in her work Elaborate Mythologies (2005) show how an artist informed by a legacy of craft-as-a-pejorative-term can take a “craft-based” medium such as glass, and produce work that isn’t really about that craft-based medium at all. Viewers might encounter this heap of bodily forms and be awed by its material qualities, or the artist’s process, but, ultimately, what’s compelling about Elaborate Mythologies is the story it has to tell. This refusal to reduce art to being the sum of its parts is possibly the most interesting potentiality offered by an exhibition like “State of the Union” (which runs through January 3, 2010).

–Analisa Coats Bacall

IF YOU GO:

“State of the Union: Contemporary Craft in Dialogue”
First and Second Floor Galleries
Philadelphia Art Alliance
251 South 18th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-6168
(215) 545-4302
info@philartalliance.org

“State of the Union: Contemporary Craft in Dialogue,” the exhibition that just opened at the Philadelphia Art Alliance, is a bid to move beyond the decades-long debate on craft versus fine art, and present work by emerging artists working in so-called craft media as a simple artistic choice. Melissa Caldwell, the Art Alliance’s director of exhibitions and the curator of this exhibition explains that she wants to track craft’s “reinstatement of itself on its own terms.” How revealing then, that, in spite of this ambition to present craft media as simply another choice that a new generation can make without the political minefield navigated by the “Craft” with a capital “C” generation, the exhibit still comes freighted with a new polemic about the notion of “craft” with a lowercase “c.”

in the words of director of exhibitions Melissa Caldwell.  To circumvent becoming polemical or simply irrelevant, the PAA exhibition makes a perhaps crucial distinction between the recognition of art and craft as unique entities with unique dialogues and the recognition of this recognition as simply one of many tropes for young artists to internalize, then push past.

Caldwell suggests that it’s not helpful to see “State of the Union” as some sort of definitive reckoning.  “It’s not a comprehensive survey,” she explains.  “It’s a sampling of interesting people.”  These “interesting people” are twelve artists working in various “craft-based” media, as the gallery’s press release describes them.  All are presented as artists who in different ways comment on the notion of craft, whether through form or process or material.  Caldwell notes the influence of recent scholarship, particularly that of British academic Glenn Adamson, on the exhibition—which is another reason the PAA can make this old dialectic fresh again.  All in all, it’s a more appropriate way to look at a topic that can be otherwise consuming.

One of the twelve to be included is Jen Blazina, a Philadelphia-based artist whose compelling installations have in the past dealt with themes of memory and ghosts of sorts.  Blazina often works in glass, though “State of the Union” features one of her cast hydrocal works.  Rachael Abrams, another of the artists, also at times uses glass in her work, which according to her artist’s statement is shaped by other sorts of dialectics: experience and time, action and consequence, and others.  The delicate glass beads Abrams incorporates for Biological Accumulations, for example, show how an artist informed by a legacy of craft-as-a-pejorative-term can take a “craft-based” medium like glass and produce work that isn’t really about that craft-based medium at all—which is perhaps the most interesting potentiality offered by an exhibition like State of the Union.

For directions and other information about visiting the gallery, click here.

2 Comments


Leave a Reply